11/30/2011 * Cavalier Daily Opinion [full story]
Ambiguity and vagueness are two well-known devices that allow politicians to present ideas or plans to a wider audience without actually having to state the specifics of said ideas and plans. Often, if such people were to express their intentions clearly, they might not get a desired reaction or approval from the majority. Unfortunately, it seems we have come face to face with a similar scenario here at the University.
... In a recent email to third- and fourth-year students, President Teresa A. Sullivan acknowledged the students’ concerns. Sullivan outlined the Board of Visitors’ reasons for considering the removal of the trees, including the fact that the magnolias are nearing their projected lifespan and reside too closely to the Rotunda. Sullivan continued, “Arborists — our own as well as outside experts — believe that the repair work on the Rotunda will only exacerbate the trees’ already fragile state.”
Yet, is the fragility or closeness of the trees the real issue at hand? The precise age of the magnolias is not even known, according to a statement from University arborist Jerry Brown that was quoted in The Daily Progress. A separate statement issued by the University’s Office of the Architect said the replacement of the roof “will impact the magnolias due to required scaffolding, materials lifts and access points.” This makes it sound as though it is the roof of the Rotunda that will impact the trees and not the trees’ fragile state that will necessitate their removal.

Recent Comments