WELCOME

  • Charlottesville Tomorrow
    News Center

    The articles on this blog were published during 2005-2012. All of this content has been moved to our new website at www.cvilletomorrow.org
    © 2005-12 Charlottesville Tomorrow
    Our photos have some rights reserved.

Categories

« County Planning Commission discusses changes for Planned Development regulations | Main | Council holds work session to learn more about poverty in Charlottesville »

December 15, 2008

Blue Ridge Sand representatives make pitch for lower-cost dredging

Reader comments (0)

King
Mitch King

Representatives from a group who are promising a lower cost estimate for the dredging of the South Fork Rivanna Reservoir gave a presentation at the December 8, 2008 meeting of the South Fork Reservoir Stewardship Task Force. While their presence was not on the formal agenda, Chair Sally Thomas allowed Mitch King and Mark Fendig of Blue Ridge Sand to speak after the conclusion of the regular meeting.

Podcast produced by Charlottesville Tomorrow * Player by Odeo

Listen using player above or download the podcast: Download 20081208-SFRR-BRS

Blue Ridge Sand is located in southwest Virginia and maintains two reservoirs behind hydroelectric power plants on the New River. King said that Blue Ridge Sand has the experience in dredging on impounded rivers, as opposed to firms like Gahagan and Bryant whose primary experience is in dredging of coastal waterways. King, who works as a renewable energy commodities dealer, wanted community decision-makers to know that other cost estimates given for dredging are, in his experience, drastically over-inflated.

The company is promoting its amphibious dredge which would simultaneously remove material from the reservoir floor and begin the dewatering process. Sediment would pass through a series of filters, which King said would speed up the process.

“It dewaters in a matter of minutes rather than months and when you do it that way, you avoid the need for a large riparian dewatering facility,” King said. He said the firm is willing to give a demonstration this winter, and that Fendig would know how to get the permits to do so. No permit would be required below a certain level of material removed from the reservoir. Fendig said he could do the limited demonstration for under $20,000.

Fendig said that his equipment would take up less than an acre, and that he has already identified potential sites to dewater the spoils. Sediment would be removed and dewatered at a volume of 100 cubic yards an hour. The material would be sorted and then hauled off to an off-site location which Blue Ridge Sand would manage. Fendig said some of the material could be used elsewhere and that he could sell material for use in the production of asphalt and concrete. 

King said that Blue Ridge Sand has taken core samples of the reservoir in 2004 and believe that material on the reservoir floor can be made useful. At time, they were making a formal pitch to the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority in the wake of the 2002 drought. Fendig said they mostly found sand, gravel and silt but additional geotechnical data on the reservoir’s floor would need to be collected to help his firm know what areas would have more value.

Fendig said dredged material is valuable in southwest Virginia, and that part of the cost of dredging reservoirs there is recovered through selling the material. In fact, he said his company profits off the sale of material. Liz Palmer, a task force member representing the Albemarle County Service Authority, asked Fendig if that meant his firm would offer to dredge the South Fork Rivanna Reservoir at no charge. Fendig said no, but said that the cost of the operation could be reduced if willing buyers could be found.

King said that if the community chose to do a one-time dredge to remove all sediment that has accumulated since the reservoir was built in 1966, there would be a very large cost associated with disposal.

“The cost issue is absolutely related to the rate at which you want the material removed and [if you are] willing to stop removing it if your market dries up for a month or two,” King said.

The task force will finalize its recommendations at a meeting on Thursday in the County Office Building on 5th Street Extended. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM in Room A.

Sean Tubbs

TIMELINE FOR PODCAST:

  • 1:00 - Mitch King gives an overview
  • 4:10 - Supervisor Sally Thomas asks how much land would be required
  • 5:30 - Supervisor Dennis Rooker asks how much volume could be obtained
  • 7:15 - ACSA Board Member Liz Palmer asks what other markets are available for sediment
  • 9:00 - Thomas asked where core samples were taken
  • 10:11 - Task Force Member Tom Jones asks how close dredges need to be to the dewatering site
  • 11:20 - Audience member Rich Collins asks about the demonstration, which he claims
  • 12:40 - Palmer asks a follow-up on dewatering sites
  • 15:15 - Rooker asks for a cost on the demonstration project
  • 16:30 - Task Force Member Mark Fletcher asks what would happen to material
  • 17:40 - Palmer asks Fendig if he will dredge the reservoir for free
  • 19:50 - Thomas follows up on what material would be like after dewatering 
  • 20:50 - Dede Smith of Citizens for a Sustainable Water Plan asks about stump removal
  • 22:10 - Rooker asks if Blue Ridge Sand has dealt with wetlands issues
  • 25:30 - Collins asks about timing and phasing of dredging to meet market demands
  • 26:30 - Gaffney asks a follow-up question about timing and who would bear the cost if market falls out
  • 30:00 - Rooker asks for a range of costs for disposal costs for any removed material
  • 31:30 - Audience member Richard Lloyd asks question about demand for sediment if economy recovers
  • 32:40 - Gaffney asks how many gallons are in a cubic yard

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834519bec69e201053667a571970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blue Ridge Sand representatives make pitch for lower-cost dredging :

Comments

Comment policy: First and last names are both required and anonymous comments are not allowed. Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this website until the editor has approved them.