City School Board to consider easement for Meadowcreek Parkway
Podcast produced by Charlottesville Tomorrow * Player by Odeo
Listen using player above or download the podcast: Download 20080403-CSB-MCP-easement.mp3
VDOT is currently negotiating with property owners over the
acquisition of right of way for the Parkway. The agency must purchase land at
the fair market value, but is asking for a donation in the case of the City-owned
land. Spencer DeJarnette, who works on
right of way issues for VDOT, told the School Board on April 3 that their
resolution was needed to convey the easements on City property to VDOT.
DeJarnette presented the Board with maps depicting the
easements, as well as the pedestrian bike trail that will run along the route
of the parkway. He remarked that this trail will provide a direct connection
between CHS and CATEC.
City Attorney Craig Brown told the Board that the purpose
for acquiring the property in the 1980’s was to provide athletic fields for
CHS. He said that even though the land is owned by the City, it was his legal
opinion that the City School Board should formally give consent, given that the
land is used for school athletics.
School Board member Kathleen Galvin raised the concern that
traffic on the road would be too fast, and perhaps inappropriate given the
proximity to the school. “It’s very alluring to see the continuous parkland going from Melbourne Road to CATEC,
however the reality it’s going to be a very fast road and it’s not going to be
pedestrian friendly by any means unless there is some conscious effort to
provide pedestrian overpasses,” Galvin said.
School Board Chairman Ned Michie shared Galvin’s concerns
about pedestrian safety, and also wanted more information on the timing of the
construction of the road. “My concern
for the school and traffic is that the County portion… will be completed prior
to the other section being completed, and then you’ll have a lot of traffic
from Rio Road flowing down this and dead-ending on Melbourne,” Michie said.
Galvin suggested adopting the resolution with conditions,
and Michie appeared to agree as well. Board member Juandiego Wade, who is
familiar with the work because of his position as the County’s transportation
planner, suggested that City staff appear before the Board at the April 17
meeting to fill in the information gaps
left by DeJarnette. But Wade also said further delay will increase the
cost of the road.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834519bec69e200e551e8df508834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference City School Board to consider easement for Meadowcreek Parkway:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.




Mr. Wade should not comment on this issue. It is clearly a conflict of interest since he is a County transportation planner but sits on the City School Board.
The situation is not of his making, but it would be appropriate that he recuse himself, from the room when this topic is discussed.
Posted by: Colette Hall | April 24, 2008 at 03:55 PM
As we note in our story on the April 17 meeting, Mr. Wade did recuse himself and left the room while the discussion was held.
Posted by: Sean Tubbs | April 24, 2008 at 06:01 PM